Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Statins results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 2,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Statins is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Statins
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,026
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos