Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Takeover results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,821 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,233 of 16,562 topics). This State Takeover is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
State Takeover
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,821
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos