Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Questions results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 375 faulty-reasoning hits from 744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,173 of 20,990 topics). This State Questions is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
State Questions
Topic details
Total words: 744
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles744 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos