Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Staffing Shortages results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 953 hits. Analysis detected 9,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,371 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,735 of 16,562 topics). This Staffing Shortages is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Staffing Shortages
Topic details
Total words: 10,371
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos