Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,085 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Sheriff results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 725 hits . Analysis detected 3,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,947 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,082 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis Sheriff is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. St Louis Sheriff
Topic details
Total words: 3,947
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst