Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Events results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 1,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,771 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,519 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis Events is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
St Louis Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,771
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos