Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paola Rodriguez results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Representativeness Heuristic, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 916 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,899 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,154 of 6,346 authors). This Paola Rodriguez is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Paola Rodriguez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Paola Rodriguez (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,899
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 16.0%16.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%In-Group Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos