Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Sports Fandom results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 5,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,560 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Fandom is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sports Fandom
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,560
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos