Gothamist77%

A Brooklyn funeral home hosted a Game 4 watch party. The Knicks came back from the dead. 37%

By Brittany Kriegstein66%

6/11/2026, 6:01:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 188 hits. Analysis detected 1,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 744 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,986 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the article peer group.

The only thing commanding sorrow at Sparrow Funeral Home in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, Wednesday night was the Knicks’ score for most of Game 4 of the NBA Finals. 
About 100 people were glued to two giant screens in rooms usually reserved for celebrating the dead, where they munched on Knicks-colored snacks (Cheetos and lollipops) and sipped free wine. 
They were very much hoping their team, which was significantly behind the San Antonio Spurs, would come back to life. 
 You know, if things go wrong, there's space for grief,” joked Robin Silver, a death doula who said she’s worked at Sparrow in the past  but had never been there for anything like this. 
The idea to host a watch party at the funeral home came to owner Erica Hill after watching Knicks center-forward Karl-Anthony Towns talk publicly about losing his mother. 
“He's going through the exact same thing as the guy down the street and the lady in the bodega and the guy on Wall Street," Hill said. 
"You know, we're all human.” 
Hill was inspired. 
She wanted to provide a space for people in the community to honor a loved one they’d lost  maybe the person they’d normally be watching the game with. 
 I was like, ‘Well, maybe we should have a watch party,’’’ Hill said, anticipating that only a handful of people would show up. 
 I thought, ‘We'll just go to the grocery store and get some chips and dip, and that will be it.’” 
After some former clients with significant social media followings posted about the event, Hill was suddenly facing a list of RSVPs that was larger than most of the funerals she hosts. 
She said she had to start turning people away. 
 I'm still processing what even happened,” she said about the attendance list as people arrived, clad in Knicks attire. 
Even Hill’s Yorkie, Peaches, who was wearing a tiny orange Knicks cape, seemed slightly overwhelmed by the crowd. 
Unlike at many bars, entry to Sparrow was free on Wednesday night. 
The space was air-conditioned, bright and roomy, with seats for just about everyone. 
But those who came to watch Game 4 said they did not come for any of that. 
 I'm here because New York's just coming together for the Knicks, and this is so representative. 
Like, it's not just the sports bars  it's the bodegas, the funeral homes,” said David Ocean. 
“I feel like this was where I would find community really coming together to watch the game.” 
 My friends were like, ‘We have to go check it out,’” said Sami Smith, who said she saw the post on Instagram. 
Silver, the death doula, said she came by because she was curious about who the other attendees would be. 
“How many people are sports people who are a little bit spooky, versus spooky people who are like bandwagon sports fans, which is totally what I am,” she said. 
 The thing that I love about living in New York is everyone's, like, a little weird.” 
True to her initial impetus for hosting the watch party, Hill provided opportunities for grieving people to honor their loved ones. 
A white poster board in the entryway, featuring a photo of Towns and his late mother, Jacqueline Cruz-Towns, encouraged guests to write the names of those they were missing. 
At halftime, the list of names was read aloud. 
“It's just great to be able to have not only the conversation around death and dying, but the conversation around grief,” said death doula Daphne McWilliams, who also works with clients at Sparrow. 
 We're part of this movement so people know they're not alone.” 
Late in the game, fans watched the Knicks revive themselves with a record-breaking comeback. 
Hill said she was already getting inquiries about a watch party for Game 5, but she’d have to turn back to regular programming. 
“I was like, ‘No, we have a funeral on Saturday.’ 
So I feel like this was sort of a one-time thing, and I'm so grateful that people are interested in showing up,” she said. 
When asked if the event might generate some future business, Hill said she had no idea. 
 I would have my funeral here,” Smith said. 
“It's really cute, and I think it's so sweet that they open their doors up to the community.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Brittany Kriegstein: 3.5%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 2.8%Brittany Kriegstein: 2.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 6.5%Brittany Kriegstein: 4.4%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 2.3%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 1.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 2.2%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 0.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 8.9%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.6%This article: 5.5%Brittany Kriegstein: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 6.5%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 5.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 9.1%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 2.8%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Brittany Kriegstein: 5.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 3.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%Brittany Kriegstein: 4.1%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.1%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 19.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 6.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion19.9%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.9%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.9%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.3%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division2.3%This article: 10.2%Brittany Kriegstein: 3.2%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal10.2%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 25.3%Brittany Kriegstein: 5.8%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice25.3%This article: 5.5%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination5.5%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittany Kriegstein: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

744 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers56%attributed speech327writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRobin Silver • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 27 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageErica Hill • 24 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Ocean • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Ocean • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Ocean • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSami Smith • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Silver • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Silver • 29 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Silver • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDaphne McWilliams • 33 words • 100.0% coverageDaphne McWilliams • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageErica Hill • 23 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 10 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 24 words • 0.0% coverageErica Hill • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSami Smith • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSami Smith • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Daphne McWilliams

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words11% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Biased Writer Voice+31.4 ptsWriter: 41.9%Daphne McWilliams: 73.3%73.3%Indoctrination+17.8 ptsWriter: 8.9%Daphne McWilliams: 26.7%26.7%Unattributed Quote-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Daphne McWilliams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.