Speaker summary
ā 50%1 analyzed article/video67.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daphne McWilliams results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 136.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of ā 50% (14,403 of 28,364 speakers). This Daphne McWilliams is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Daphne McWilliams
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 50%Daphne McWilliams (selected)32%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 67.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
31.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.7%36.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos