Topic summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos1,921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Cars results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,121 hits. Analysis detected 7,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,414 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,116 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Cars is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Sports Cars
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,414
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos