Topic summary
ā 72% 1 analyzed article/video 154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Forces results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Ad Hominem , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 346 hits . Analysis detected 1,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ā 87% (2,177 of 16,562 topics). This Special Forces is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Special Forces
Topic details
Total words: 1,232
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.9% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 28.1% 28.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 16.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst