Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Education Support Staff results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,640 of 15,847 topics). This Special Education Support Staff is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Special Education Support Staff
Topic details
Total words: 1,224
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos