Topic summary
⁠17%5 analyzed articles/videos4,453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spain National Football Team results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,168 hits. Analysis detected 10,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,921 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,369 of 16,562 topics). This Spain National Football Team is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Spain National Football Team

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos