Topic summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Research results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 2,202 hits . Analysis detected 14,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,601 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,433 of 15,854 topics). This Space Research is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Space Research
Topic details
Total words: 9,601
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 22.9% 22.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst