Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socialism Vs Capitalism results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 2,826 hits. Analysis detected 20,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,154 of 16,562 topics). This Socialism Vs Capitalism is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Socialism Vs Capitalism
Topic details
Total words: 10,168
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.8%27.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.4%17.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos