Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Hemingway results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,935 hits. Analysis detected 12,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,355 of 6,498 authors). This Mark Hemingway is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Mark Hemingway
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
80%Mark Hemingway (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,164
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 31.4%31.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 22.6%22.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 25.3%25.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.3%16.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 25.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos