Topic summary
20%2 analyzed articles/videos2,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Influence results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 4,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,635 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (14,034 of 16,562 topics). This Social Media Influence is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Social Media Influence
Topic details
Total words: 7,635
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos