Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Snow Forecast results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 4,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (684 of 16,562 topics). This Snow Forecast is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Snow Forecast
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,696
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.9% percentile
13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 32.2%32.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 30.8%30.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 22.8%22.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 20.8%20.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.3%32.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.3%32.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 32.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos