Topic summary
54% 5 analyzed articles/videos 316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smoke results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,903 hits . Analysis detected 8,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,686 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,596 of 16,266 topics). This Smoke is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Smoke
Topic details
Total words: 13,686
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst