Topic summary
22% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Siri results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,929 hits . Analysis detected 15,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,189 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,749 of 15,775 topics). This Siri is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Siri
Topic details
Total words: 27,189
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst