Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shawarma results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 1,190 hits . Analysis detected 6,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,045 of 15,801 topics). This Shawarma is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Shawarma
Topic details
Total words: 3,272
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.1% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 26.4% 26.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 24.2% 24.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 36.4% 36.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 24.4% 24.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 36.4%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst