Topic summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shadow Docket results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,164 hits. Analysis detected 8,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,172 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,022 of 16,562 topics). This Shadow Docket is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Shadow Docket
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,172
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos