Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sex Crimes results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,202 of 15,753 topics). This Sex Crimes is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Sex Crimes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos