Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Severe Storms results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,928 of 16,562 topics). This Severe Storms is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Severe Storms
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,060
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos