Topic summary
29%1 analyzed article/video521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Settlement Violence results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 2,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,158 of 16,562 topics). This Settlement Violence is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Settlement Violence
Topic details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos