Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Republicans results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,064 hits. Analysis detected 5,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,524 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,127 of 16,559 topics). This Senate Republicans is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Senate Republicans
Topic details
Total words: 4,524
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.5%23.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos