Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Confirmation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 958 hits. Analysis detected 4,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,387 of 15,785 topics). This Senate Confirmation is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Senate Confirmation
Topic details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos