Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chase Williams results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 2,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,470 of 6,628 authors). This Chase Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Chase Williams
Author details
Total words: 2,436
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst