Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chase Williams results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 267 hits. Analysis detected 2,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,470 of 6,628 authors). This Chase Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Chase Williams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
63%Chase Williams (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,436
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.6%8.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos