Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Self Defense Claim results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 473 hits. Analysis detected 3,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,115 of 15,447 topics). This Self Defense Claim is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Self Defense Claim
Topic details
Total words: 4,028
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos