Family of man killed in Times Square attack sparked by TikTok trend rejects self-defense claim 69%

By Emma Seiwell50% Julian Roberts-Grmela0%

5/8/2026, 8:40:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 645 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,909 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the article peer group.

The family of a man killed in Times Square by a 17-year-old boy accused of waking him from sleep as part of a viral TikTok trend before plunging a knife into his chest wholly rejected the suspect’s claims that it was “self-defense.” 
“It would be self-defense if he was attacking him or something but he was f*cking sleeping.” said victim Leonides Baez’ male relative, who wished to remain anonymous. 
Baez’ younger sister, who said she viewed surveillance footage of the slaying obtained by detectives, said her sibling was not the aggressor “whatsoever.” 
“It’s a lie. 
It was clearly not self-defense. 
It was just three punks that messed with my brother,” said the 36-year-old sister, who declined to share her name. 
“It’s ridiculous. 
They were bored. 
These dumb little kids were freaking bored. 
They didn’t have nothing [better to do.]” 
Baez, 39, was sleeping on the sidewalk outside of Burger & Lobster restaurant on W. 43rd St. near Seventh Ave. 
Monday night when the teen suspect and two friends woke him up and began harassing him, at one point urinating in a cup and throwing it on the victim, according to prosecutors citing surveillance footage. 
The footage shows the teen suspect drawing a knife from his vest pocket and chasing the victim into a breezeway, where he stabbed him in the chest, according to court documents. 
The suspect, who was swiftly arrested on Thursday, shouted at reporters as he awaited arraignment in Manhattan Criminal Court, saying, “It was self-defense, p—y! 
Suck my d–k! 
 It was self-defense!” 
He then told the Daily News, “He punched me first  so I stabbed him,” he continued. 
“He’s a grown man beating up on kids.” 
The teen, whose name was not released by the NYPD because he’s a minor, admitted to detectives that he zeroed in on Baez because he was following a “mess-with-a-crack-head” trend on TikTok, a police source said. 
Baez’ younger sister said he was “not a crack head” but a “fully functional”, free-spirited wanderer who was homeless by choice. 
“You had so much life ahead of you and you chose the street life, thinking everything is just a game because you’re just showing off or you’re following whatever trend he was following,” the sister said of the suspect. 
“But look what you just did. 
You just threw your whole life away and you might not see the light of day again.” 
The teen suspect was also charged Thursday in a string of violent robberies and slashings targeting retailers in Midtown. 
In one case, the victim told police he confronted the teen and three of his friends after they began looting his souvenir shop on W. 40th St. near Seventh Ave. around 9:35 p.m. on April 7, court documents show. 
“I’m gonna cut your face,” the teen allegedly screamed, before cutting the merchant’s right hand and fleeing the store. 
And on May 3  the day before he allegedly killed Baez  the suspect and three other teens pilfered a Seventh Ave. newsstand near W. 54th St. in Midtown around 3 a.m., according to a complaint. 
A kiosk worker, who declined to give his name, told the News on Friday that one suspect pulled a knife. 
“I see the knife, they take money,” he said. 
“Open the door, the knife, just take money.” 
Police said the teens broke a glass window, and the suspect snatched $300 from the kiosk’s operator. 
The teen then got into a fight involving several people on the sidewalk before slashing a man in the chest, court documents show. 
The teen suspect was ordered held without bail after pleading not guilty at his arraignment on Thursday. 
When asked what she hopes will happen to the suspect, Baez’ sister said: “Rot in hell. 
No pity, nothing. 
Rot in hell.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.3%Emma Seiwell: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Emma Seiwell: 3.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 2.9%Emma Seiwell: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.8%This article: 12.7%Emma Seiwell: 5.8%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Emma Seiwell: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias11.2%This article: 25.9%Emma Seiwell: 11.4%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias25.9%This article: 1.2%Emma Seiwell: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias1.2%This article: 13.5%Emma Seiwell: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error13.5%This article: 2.6%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Emma Seiwell: 4.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Emma Seiwell: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 5.7%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Emma Seiwell: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem4.7%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.1%Emma Seiwell: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority28.1%This article: 6.8%Emma Seiwell: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma6.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Emma Seiwell: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.7%Emma Seiwell: 10.0%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion15.7%This article: 2.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 11.3%Emma Seiwell: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.3%This article: 2.6%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque2.6%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.3%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.3%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.6%Emma Seiwell: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal7.6%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.1%Emma Seiwell: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 1.9%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.2%Emma Seiwell: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 9.8%Emma Seiwell: 3.9%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice9.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

645 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers32%attributed speech437writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageBaez’ younger sister • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ younger sister • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ younger sister • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDaily News • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 36 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ younger sister • 21 words • 100.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 39 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBaez’ sister • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words25% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice+30.8 ptsWriter: 9.6%Baez’ younger sister: 40.4%40.4%Quote-first Misdirection-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Baez’ younger sister: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.