Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Secularism results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,868 hits. Analysis detected 11,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,240 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,802 of 16,562 topics). This Secularism is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Secularism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,240
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos