Instead of meeting in churches, a Kansas City addiction recovery group tries a secular approach 53%

By Anne Kniggendorf0%

6/26/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 728 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.9% and a BS Rank of 53% (10,319 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the article peer group.

Church basements are stereotypical settings for addiction recovery meetings. 
And Michael DePriest says he understands why, but that, maybe, it’s time for them to move into the daylight. 
So DePriest, the founder and director of the nonprofit recovery community organization MyRecoveryKC, developed a program that’s secular and takes place in a public library. 
“I do think that, in order for us to change the stigma around recovery, around addiction, we do need to come out in the forefront a little bit more,” he says, “so having these meetings in these public spaces, instead of the back room of a place.” 
When Bill Wilson and Bob Smith conceived of Alcoholics Anonymous in the 1930s, they wanted to help professionals in small cities, DePriest says, “and so the anonymous part was important to them.” 
And while some aspects of the anonymity are still significant, DePriest and the Kansas City Public Library have teamed up to try a different approach they hope will help more people who are struggling. 
The 12-step program he facilitates each week at the library system’s North-East Branch and Central Library aims to eliminate the stigma as well as other barriers faced by people with substance abuse disorders. 
Most prominent 12-step programs like Alcoholics Anonymous lean on Christian beliefs and themes, which the library’s health and well-being specialist Jamie Placht says is inappropriate for the diverse population the library serves. 
With that barrier in mind, Placht asked DePriest, whom he’d worked with on other programs, to adapt the 12 steps to make them feel welcoming to people of all  or no  religious backgrounds. 
“There aren’t many groups doing that,” Placht says, “so just creating that space for people, we thought it was important.” 
The group also tries to address what can be another daunting challenge for recoverers: loss of community. 
“Sometimes folks in the addiction space, that becomes their community,” Placht says, “and stepping outside of that community may mean losing friends or, you know, losing that immediate support.” 
‘The power of community’ 
At its core, DePriest says his program is similar to AA in that it’s still a “recovery fellowship.” 
“We believe in the power of community, honest self-reflection, personal growth, and supporting one another in recovery,” he explains. 
But instead of looking to religion, DePriest encourages people to draw from their own values, experiences, strengths, relationships, and understanding of recovery, regardless of spiritual beliefs. 
The meetings in library spaces are new in 2026 and, so far, in addition to people with substance abuse disorders, DePriest has seen people with eating disorders and gambling abuse issues. 
“Twelve-step groups have always been accessible to everyone,” DePriest says. 
“Whether it's NA, AA or any other 12-step model. 
It's a place where people don't necessarily have to wait to start amassing some recovery capital and moving forward in their lives without alcohol or drugs.” 
That low barrier makes the program both a great bridge to recovery, he says, and a helpful maintenance space, because it helps address the lack of immediate access to in-patient treatment. 
Once someone decides they’re ready for treatment, DePriest says, waiting even a week or two for a spot in a recovery facility gives them time to change their mind or lose momentum. 
Placht says the library is an important partner in that journey precisely because it’s “out of a clinical space.” 
“I see us as kind of like that access point to be a triage to get them to the right places, and we're getting them connected to the right people on top of the support that Michael and his team can provide,” Placht says. 
DePriest says these programs are also typically a place where people can borrow from each other’s hope and strength, taking bits and pieces of what they learn from each other. 
“Our hope for the group is simply that you'll hear something, that something will be said, that something will be done, that you'll meet somebody that will advance your recovery,” he says. 
DePriest’s secular 12-step programs take place from noon-1 p.m. on Saturdays at the Kansas City Public Library’s Central location, 14 W. 10th St., Kansas City, Missouri 64105; and on Mondays from 3 p.m.-4 p.m. at the North-East Branch, 6000 Wilson Ave., Kansas City, Missouri 64132. 
Visit KCLibrary.org/calendar for more details. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.5%Anne Kniggendorf: 2.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 1.2%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.2%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 18.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 10.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect18.4%This article: 4.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion4.4%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 28.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 11.7%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias28.4%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias2.3%This article: 6.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 4.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.4%This article: 4.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 3.6%Anne Kniggendorf: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.1%Anne Kniggendorf: 8.0%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization18.1%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 4.3%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion6.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.7%Anne Kniggendorf: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.7%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.4%Anne Kniggendorf: 6.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal8.4%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.5%Anne Kniggendorf: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.5%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.6%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading2.6%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote6.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 6.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.2%Anne Kniggendorf: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 10.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination10.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anne Kniggendorf: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Anne Kniggendorf: 3.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.8%

728 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers66%attributed speech250writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Placht • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Placht • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Placht • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Placht • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 31 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Placht • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Placht • 44 words • 100.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMichael DePriest • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael DePriest

100%flagged-word coverage
299 attributed words63% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+24.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michael DePriest: 24.4%24.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.6 ptsWriter: 20.0%Michael DePriest: 19.4%19.4%Biased Writer Voice-1.2 ptsWriter: 7.6%Michael DePriest: 6.4%6.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.