Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Fugelsang results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,830 hits . Analysis detected 9,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,227 of 6,629 authors). This John Fugelsang is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. John Fugelsang
Author details
Total words: 8,328
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst