Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Neighborhoods results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Status Quo Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 2,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,295 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,644 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Neighborhoods is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Seattle Neighborhoods
Topic details
Total words: 2,295
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos