Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Bessent results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 2,697 hits. Analysis detected 16,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,698 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,308 of 15,785 topics). This Scott Bessent is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Scott Bessent
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,698
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.4%21.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos