Topic summary
⁠74%4 analyzed articles/videos4,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientific Integrity results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 3,550 hits. Analysis detected 24,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,371 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,490 of 16,559 topics). This Scientific Integrity is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Scientific Integrity

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos