Topic summary
⁠24%3 analyzed articles/videos358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savings Accounts results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 3,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,836 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,170 of 16,562 topics). This Savings Accounts is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Savings Accounts
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos