Children’s Savings Accounts 69%

By Steve Zehngut35%

12/7/2009, 3:29:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, False Dilemma, and Bandwagon, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 250 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,871 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the article peer group.

The Case for Creating a Lifelong Savings Platform at Birth as a Foundation for a “Save-and-Invest” Economy 
December 7, 2009 
Reid Cramer 
David Newville 
A growing chorus, including President Obama, now believes that a prosperous future for our country will depend on the creation of a save-and-invest economy that will enable all Americans to accumulate savings and assets. 
While in the short-term, public investment should be expanded in order to stabilize the economy, any long-term plan for sustainable economic growth will have to involve increased household savings over an extended time horizon. 
One promising approach to that goal is children’s savings accounts (CSAs), which would be established at birth for every American. 
This paper makes the case for establishing a universal system of children’s savings accounts (CSAs) in the United States. 
It provides a brief overview of the essential components of a CSA and how they would work, and the rationale and evidence for a CSAs plan. 
To read the policy paper, click here, or on the Related Files link to the right. 
Attachments: 
Children’s Savings Accounts: The Case for Creating a Lifelong Savings Platform at Birth 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.7%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 2.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.4%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Steve Zehngut: 12.2%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.6%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.5%Steve Zehngut: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 17.9%Steve Zehngut: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias17.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.6%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 11.3%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.9%Steve Zehngut: 3.2%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority17.9%This article: 17.9%Steve Zehngut: 3.1%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma17.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.1%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 6.9%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 17.9%Steve Zehngut: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon17.9%This article: 10.5%Steve Zehngut: 4.8%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion10.5%This article: 10.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.7%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question10.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 6.0%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 2.7%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.0%Steve Zehngut: 12.9%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice10.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 2.7%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.4%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.4%

190 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.