Topic summary
72% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savings results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Recency Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,068 hits . Analysis detected 9,205 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,822 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,581 of 16,562 topics). This Savings is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Savings
Topic details
Total words: 7,822
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst