Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sam Neill results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 1,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sam Neill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sam Neill
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.8%27.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos