Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sacrifice results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 1,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of â 74% (4,347 of 16,562 topics). This Sacrifice is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Sacrifice
Topic details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst