Topic summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russian Economy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 3,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,920 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (8,964 of 15,689 topics). This Russian Economy is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Russian Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,920
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos