Topic summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia NATO Relations results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,066 hits. Analysis detected 8,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,568 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,178 of 15,690 topics). This Russia NATO Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Russia NATO Relations
Topic details
Total words: 5,568
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.1%19.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos