Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royal Family's Public Image results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,538 of 16,562 topics). This Royal Family's Public Image is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Royal Family's Public Image
Topic details
Total words: 964
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles964 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.9%39.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 34.8%34.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 16.9%16.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.3%8.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos