Author summary
91%1 analyzed article/video241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kara Kennedy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 94% (410 of 6,297 authors). This Kara Kennedy is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Kara Kennedy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Kara Kennedy (selected)10%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 964
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles964 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 39.9%39.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 34.8%34.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 16.9%16.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 8.3%8.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 8.3%8.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 34.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 26.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 12.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos