Topic summary
ā 43%2 analyzed articles/videos3,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robots results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,725 hits. Analysis detected 12,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 39% (10,116 of 16,558 topics). This Robots is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Robots
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 39%Robots (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 10,792
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos