Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Robotics In Warfare results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 4,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Robotics In Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Robotics In Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 2,924
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.3%26.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.4%22.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos