Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robin Williams results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 1,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ā 54% (7,472 of 16,164 topics). This Robin Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Robin Williams
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 54%Robin Williams (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.1%17.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos