Topic summary
23% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Risk Management results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,059 hits . Analysis detected 11,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,067 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (12,357 of 16,562 topics). This Risk Management is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Risk Management
Topic details
Total words: 13,067
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst